Chain/ Black history & present-day America
Support Chain
Chain · Era 9 · Present Day
Present Day · 1961–2023

Affirmative Action:
45 Years of Policy, Dismantled in One Ruling

Affirmative action — the policy of considering race as one factor among many in university admissions to remedy documented historical discrimination — survived 45 years of legal challenge before the Supreme Court ended it in June 2023. From Executive Order 10925 (1961) to Bakke (1978) to Grutter (2003), the courts had repeatedly upheld the principle that diversity in education serves a compelling government interest. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and UNC (2023), a 6-3 Court ruled it unconstitutional. The ruling did not address the discrimination that created the need for the policy. It simply ended the remedy.

EO 10925
1961 — Kennedy coins 'affirmative action'
Bakke
1978 — quotas banned, holistic review allowed
SFFA v. Harvard
June 2023 — race-conscious admissions ended
Affirmative Action
The Central Argument

Affirmative action was not a policy that gave unqualified Black students preference over qualified white students — that is the myth that was constructed to defeat it. It was a policy that allowed universities to consider race as one factor, among dozens, in building a diverse class — the same way they consider geography, athletic ability, legacy status (which overwhelmingly benefits white applicants), and donor relationships. The Court ended race-conscious admissions while leaving legacy preferences — which benefit white applicants at 45% rates at elite schools — completely intact. The ruling was not about fairness. It was about which forms of preference are permissible.

The Legal Arc · 1961–2023
01
1961–1978

From Kennedy to Bakke: Building and Limiting the Policy

Washington D.C. · University of California, Davis

President Kennedy's Executive Order 10925 (1961) introduced the phrase "affirmative action" — requiring federal contractors to take affirmative action to ensure employees and applicants were treated without regard to race. Johnson's Executive Order 11246 (1965) expanded this to require active outreach. Universities began developing admissions programs that considered race as a factor in building diverse classes. In 1978, the Supreme Court in Regents of UC v. Bakke struck down explicit racial quotas (UC Davis had reserved 16 of 100 medical school seats for minority students) but upheld race as one factor in holistic review. Justice Powell's opinion described diversity as a compelling educational interest that justified considering race — a framework that held for 25 years.

02
2003–2023

Grutter to SFFA: The Long Dismantling

University of Michigan · Harvard · UNC
45%
Legacy admission rate boost at elite schools — left untouched by SFFA ruling
6–3
SFFA ruling vote — along ideological lines

In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), the Court upheld the University of Michigan Law School's holistic admissions program 5-4, with Justice O'Connor writing that the Court expected affirmative action would no longer be necessary in 25 years. In 2023, 20 years later, the 6-3 conservative supermajority ended it entirely in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and UNC. The ruling did not find that discrimination no longer existed — it found that race-conscious remedies violated the Equal Protection Clause. Chief Justice Roberts wrote: "Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it." The ruling left legacy preferences — documented to provide 45% admission rate boosts at elite schools, and to overwhelmingly benefit white and wealthy applicants — completely untouched.

The practical effect was immediate: after California banned affirmative action in 1996, Black enrollment at UC Berkeley fell 50% within two years. Michigan, Washington, and other states that had banned the practice saw similar declines. The SFFA ruling will produce the same effects nationally. The diversity that the Grutter Court had identified as a compelling educational interest was not the Court's concern in 2023.

"Eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it." — Chief Justice Roberts, SFFA v. Harvard (2023)

"The majority's vision of race neutrality will entrench racial inequality." — Justice Sotomayor, dissenting

The Longer Chain

The remedy was ended without ending the harm it remedied.

Affirmative action was a response to 350 years of documented exclusion from American institutions. The SFFA ruling eliminated the response without addressing the exclusion. The wealth gap, the education gap, the representation gap — all remain. The tool to address them at the institutional level is now gone.

DEI & Rollback → → All Threads
Next in the chain
Black Maternal Mortality: Dying to Give Birth in America
Continue →