Not a Monolith: The Specific Peoples the Slave Trade Took
The word "African" — like the word "Black" — is not how the people it describes primarily understood themselves. Before the slave trade, before colonialism, before the imposition of racial categories, the people of the African continent understood themselves primarily through specific ethnic, linguistic, and political identities: Yoruba, Igbo, Akan, Wolof, Mandé, Fon, BaKongo, Hausa, Fulani, Zulu, Xhosa, Maasai, and hundreds of others.
Africa is the most ethnically and linguistically diverse continent on Earth. It contains over 2,000 distinct ethnic groups speaking more than 1,500 languages. The peoples of the Sahel have different histories, religions, and political traditions than the peoples of the forest zones or the eastern highlands. A Yoruba person and a Wolof person in 1600 shared no more cultural identity than a Norwegian and a Greek — and they knew it.
The slave trade deliberately erased this specificity. On the ships and in the markets of the Americas, these distinct people were reduced to one category: "Negro," "African," "slave." Their names were taken. Their languages were prohibited. Their religions were suppressed. The destruction of specific identity was not a side effect of the slave trade — it was one of its functions. A person who does not know where they come from is harder to organize around their origin.
The prohibition on African languages, the replacement of African names with European ones, the suppression of African religion — these were not incidental to slavery. They were its ideological infrastructure. A person without a remembered origin can be told their origin is servitude. Erasing the specific peoples was the first step in constructing "Black" as a racial category defined by subordination.